<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome EULA Troubles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.knlc.net/index.php/2008/09/03/google-chrome-eula-troubles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.knlc.net/index.php/2008/09/03/google-chrome-eula-troubles/</link>
	<description>Family, news and other stuff...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelley</title>
		<link>http://www.knlc.net/index.php/2008/09/03/google-chrome-eula-troubles/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knlc.net/?p=228#comment-6</guid>
		<description>And the tempest in a teapot award goes to....This whole business...It&#039;s already been addressed by Google.

Here&#039;s the quote (From ArsTechnica):

Google&#039;s Rebecca Ward, Senior Product Counsel for Google Chrome, now tells Ars Technica that the company tries to reuse these licenses as much as possible, &quot;in order to keep things simple for our users.&quot; Ward admits that sometimes &quot;this means that the legal terms for a specific product may include terms that don&#039;t apply well to the use of that product&quot; and says that Google is &quot;working quickly to remove language from Section 11 of the current Google Chrome terms of service. This change will apply retroactively to all users who have downloaded Google Chrome.&quot;

So -- Esseentially, they are saying &quot;Whoops -- Our bad&quot;.

Kelley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the tempest in a teapot award goes to&#8230;.This whole business&#8230;It&#8217;s already been addressed by Google.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the quote (From ArsTechnica):</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s Rebecca Ward, Senior Product Counsel for Google Chrome, now tells Ars Technica that the company tries to reuse these licenses as much as possible, &#8220;in order to keep things simple for our users.&#8221; Ward admits that sometimes &#8220;this means that the legal terms for a specific product may include terms that don&#8217;t apply well to the use of that product&#8221; and says that Google is &#8220;working quickly to remove language from Section 11 of the current Google Chrome terms of service. This change will apply retroactively to all users who have downloaded Google Chrome.&#8221;</p>
<p>So &#8212; Esseentially, they are saying &#8220;Whoops &#8212; Our bad&#8221;.</p>
<p>Kelley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
